Amazing.
Simply Amazing.
Russia Blowing it up in Da Swamp.
Running a very close second to the Ol' U.S of .A.
Russia.
Ya All The Beautiful Best.
Major Swamp Love Russia.
Yo.
Minsk.
Swamp Shout Out.
Talk About Tuff Peep's.
Для реальной России. Я. Все Черт Красивая лучше. Спасибо Я. Все так очень за чтение. Не Йо Мама сказать тебе все Бута Da Болото?
Мой Dawg Сэм, который шпаргалки здесь, в горах, из России. Говорит, что он родился в том же городе, Путина. Sayz Я. Все звонок в мой главный Dawg 2Pac. Наверняка Я. Все Trippin.
Йо. Vladdy. Слово на Da-стрит является Вы Trippin вверх в Da Болото. По-настоящему. Vladdy вы все вверх в Pac? Болото Любовь моя парня. Оставайтесь в безопасности My Man.
For Real.
I damn sure hope I got the above right.
I can only hope and pray.
I Found The Following Article Interesting
Hope Ya All Do As Well.
As Usual.
For Real Newz.
Realclearworld.com
Or
The Usual Advertising Driven American Newz Organization.
That Includes All The Stations.
If history and petropolitics teach us anything, it's that the collapse of Iraq shouldn't come as surprise
You only need to go back ten years to see how this was a crisis waiting to happen
So while Obama’s Spartan 300 deploy to Iraq’s Thermopylae, it’s worth
taking a look at why the new Sunni Islamist caliphate of Iraq should
have come as no surprise to any of us.
Horror it may be. Shock it is not. Take Tel Afar, the Iraqi town
close to Iraq’s border with Syria – when the border still existed, that
is – which has just “fallen” to the rebels. The Americans were
scrambling to hold on to this frontier way station almost 10 years ago
and had to “recapture” it from Al-Qaeda-style insurgents at least once.
Indeed,
Hassan Jamal Sulieman Oweydah, a Palestinian from the Mieh Mieh refugee
camp in Lebanon, rammed his car into an American convoy at Tel Afar in
December of 2004.
He was the first Palestinian “martyr” in the war
against the US occupation of Iraq – and came from the same “Levant”
forming part of the title of the Iraqi-Syrian rebel group.
“The
last time I saw Hassan, he was standing in the gateway you’ve just
walked through,” his mother told me two years later. By then, 25 other
Palestinians had been killed in Iraq.
“I thought he was going to
go and I might not see him again and I said to ‘come back’. But he said,
‘Leaving is not like returning. It is not important for me to return.’ ”
Hassan’s
Palestinian friend Ahmed al-Faran later blew himself up in a suicide
bomb attack in Fallujah, another of the towns now invested by the
Islamist Sunni rebels of Iraq. Twice, the Americans had to “capture”
Mosul before they left Iraq. And for well over a year before its
“capture” this month – although the country’s flag flew over official
buildings – large parts of the city remained effectively outside
government control.
And who can be surprised at the “capture” of
Haditha, announced to the now-familiar consternation on Saturday night.
As a centre of Sunni anti-Western resistance, was it not bound to fall
to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isis) and its chums?
And
has everyone forgotten – for not a soul mentioned this yesterday – that
this was the scene of the most infamous US war crime in Iraq, the
massacre by US marines of 24 unarmed men, women and children in November
2005, a slaughter supposedly carried out in revenge for the killing of a
marine in the town.
Of course, we may rage to our hearts’ content at the destruction of our whole absurd Iraqi project.
The New York Times
columnist Roger Cohen, normally the calmest of fellows, was in
historical wrath mode only last week. “Iraq and Syria ... were rotten to
the core, as ripe for dismemberment as the Ottoman Empire a century
ago, sickened by the personality cults of brutal rulers, cracking at the
internal lines of fracture colonial overseers chose to disregard,”
Cohen roared. “They were in a state of postponed decomposition.”
Well,
not really. Outrageous though the Sykes-Picot agreement was, it did at
least leave Ottoman Mesopotamia in one piece (although France wanted
Mosul for itself). The problem was that the Brits foisted a Sunni king
from Arabia on to the country and thus ensured that the people would
never exercise real freedom, and never learn the benefits of such
dignity.
It was, as we know, about oil — the same reason for the
2003 Anglo-American invasion and the strike north by US forces to
capture Mosul. If the city’s major export was – let us say – asparagus,
does anyone believe the 82nd Airborne would have been sent there?
And
oil still remains – weirdly — an unspoken reason for this new war.
Sure, it’s a blow to the Iraqi government to lose the oil facilities of
Baiji. But it’s much more of a victory for Saudi Arabia – which funds
the bearded Islamists swarming across Iraq – since the capture of Mosul
has cut the city’s oil supplies to the outside world and closed down
output from Baiji itself.
Saudi Arabia’s claim to be the greatest
oil producer in the world is no longer threatened by Shia Iraq’s output,
nor the undiscovered reserves which might turn Iraq into the greatest
oil producer and which lie, quite literally, under the boots of the
al-Qa’ida-inspired Salafists who now threaten Maliki.
The
tomb-desecration apparently already under way in Mosul is not unlike the
destruction of images in the Syrian city of Raqqa, which the very same
Islamists long ago included in the caliphate. It’s just what the
Wahabi-style Taliban did to the Buddhas of Bamian in Afghanistan in
2001. And the Taliban – let us remember, oh please, let’s not forget –
were funded by the very same Saudi Arabia.
Iraq’s tragedy is
terrifying enough – for the Christians of the country, for the new
cities of refugees moving across its borders, for the sectarianisation
of the whole Middle East – without stubbornly refusing to accept that
this whole revolt has been going on for years, that hatred of America
plays a foundation role and that our Saudi mates are lock, stock and
barrel behind it. Officially, they deny this. Unofficially, they have
been boasting for years of their support for the Syrian Islamists who
fight the Alawite (Shia) Bashar al-Assad – who are exactly the same as
those now threatening Baghdad.
One
Middle East newspaper last week wrote scathingly of the failure of Arab
“unity”. The Arabs had failed to unite over “Palestine”. They had
failed to unite through nationalism or Baathism. The only true unity
evident of late was that of refugees. Refugees from Palestine, from
Syria, from Iraq, from Somalia and Sudan and South Sudan. It might be
time, the paper concluded, for the Arab League to offer refugees their
own seat in time for the next Arab Summit.
And, of course, today
let’s remember Lebanon and Hassan Oweydah who killed himself in Tel Afar
all those years ago. He even arranged for his mother to receive a
videotape – she showed it to me – of him cheerfully waving goodbye as he
drove off to “martyrdom” in his bomb-rigged car.
The Salafists of
Syria and Iraq have received arms and money via their Sunni militant
allies in Lebanon – part of the frontier town of Ersal has for months
been a virtual Islamist enclave inside Lebanon.
The “Levant” means
Lebanon as well as Syria. And if they’re victorious in destroying Iraq
and Assad of Syria, many of these young men will return “home” to
Lebanon. In their thousands. Perhaps that should be our “thought for the
day” as we gasp, breathless, at the news from Baghdad.