Terrible 2zzDay
Ahhhhh Shit.
Dun Fucked Up Now.
My Niggas Bout Ready To Feel Dis.
Nothin But A Gansta Party.
Runnin With The Disciples.
Jesus' Own Gansta Disciples.
Yeah Shepperd.
Dis Sheep Hears You Loud and Clear Sir.
Been There.
Done Dat.
Ya All Gonna Feel Dis.
Dayz into Nitez.
Nitez into Dayz.
Millenniums passing in Nano Frames.
Lifetimes absorbed in the Should Beez.
Until.
Slam Whammo.
Straight Up Damn Kabamo.
Reality Hitz like a Mac 10 round @ less than inches.
Grabbing at what is fading faster than a gnat in old age.
Metamorphosing into the left behind losses stacked on the side of the road pyramid high.
Belligerence and Anger plead down to a lesser charge.
But oh the fuck no.
Jus to damn late Slappy.
No one wants to hear it.
Kindness coming late as the framework smolders.
All the fire hoses long ago melted as the blaze blasts forward.
The hate long ago dissipated into the ghostly form of the walking dead.
Yeah.
I know you love me.
You alwayz have.
Now you see your evil/wicked Hoein wayz.
Say you feel so, so bad.
Oh well.
I stood tall while you continued the rape of all that was worth a fuckin thang.
Your Adulteress wayz are way to far gone down the freeway leading to the off ramp at Oblivion Blvd.
Yeah.
You Gorgeous.
Your tantalizing wayz are the supreme thread that defines your sexual proclivity towards the perverse.
Too bad.
Way, way late.
Never gettin back what you once lost and really never had.
Gotta go.
Don't care.
Jus keep raping my stackz($) to the end of dayz.
You will never deplete my resources.
Cause my resources are supplied by HIM.
Ya don't stand a chance.
I will alwayz walk before you ever make me run.
Cause for real, my path is HIS path.
You can't touch this Bitch.
Your Female vengeance will never ever prevail.
And No.
You will NEVER have me again.
I serve only HIM.
Not the material mumbo jumbo you crave for and put on the Hoe Line every day.
I will never.
Ever satisfy your Adulteress wayz.
That stiff vibe dissipated ions ago in a long lost past.
Now over and over you scream how much you love and miss me.
Oh well.
A complete your bad.
Cause for sure.
Dis train dun pulled out da station.
Leaving you in the dust of the past.
Poor Fuckin You.
Tuvo su oportunidad perra. ver nunca más. chupar el dick de todo mi dinero. eso es lo que han dejado, quiero ser sólo fuckin bien. nos vemos bitch.escriba la palabra, frase o texto completo
The World
On the road to Obama's complete destruction of America.
A President who stands firmly on the ground of American Terrorism delivered from a pulpit of lies.
The master plan to finally and forever to place this country in the dark dark ages.
Powered by money from the criminal enterprises of the likes of TOM STEYER.
Criminal Par Excellence.
Corrupt Wicked Dollars to the Bought and Sold Barry Obama.
Billionaire Tom Steyer turning his anti-Keystone offensive ...
hotair.com/.../billionaire-tom-steyer-turning-his-anti-keystone-off..June 7, 2014
An Energy Plan to Impoverish America
By Daniel McGroarty
After
one of the longer political drum-rolls in policy wonkery, President
Obama announced this week the proposed new EPA rule for cutting carbon
dioxide emissions to combat climate change.
The goal, expressed in 645 pages of eye-glazing detail: to cut CO2 emissions from the U.S. power sector 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. The 30-by-30 mantra makes for a nice sound bite, but read through the EPA press releases for a projection on how that reduction will affect average global temperatures, and you'll come up empty. That's odd, for a policy that's justified as essential to save the planet.
So, how much will the new rule prevent Earth from warming? According to modeling done using the EPA's own MAGICC model -- Model for the Assessment of Greenhouse gas Induced Climate Change -- if the U.S. stopped emitting all carbon dioxide emissions today, the impact on projected global temperature rise would be a reduction of 0.17°C by the year 2100.
Using data drawn from U.S. Energy Information Administration, if the U.S. were to reduce all carbon dioxide emissions immediately to zero, the climatological savings would be cancelled out by the rest of the world's carbon dioxide production -- in just seven years.
The Lying Threesome.
If the impact on the climate is near invisible, the impact on the economy is far larger -- and immediate.
The war has already begun over the accuracy of the cost estimates for the new EPA rule advanced by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others, but the notion that the U.S. -- when 40 percent of the country's current electricity production comes from coal -- could weather the imposition of stringent carbon-emission standards without significant economic costs seems fantastic. Indeed, the more candid supporters of the new EPA rule celebrate just that fact: Coal will be priced into oblivion. In this view, rising energy prices will accelerate the transition to a post-petroleum energy future. The fact that ordinary Americans would be forced to cinch their own belts is a small cost to pay for planetary survival.
That leaves it to industry to speak for the average American. "Today, American policy should be guided not by a modeled crisis," said Peabody Energy, which produces 10 percent of U.S. electricity, "but by the real crisis of more than one of every three U.S. households that qualify for energy assistance," a reference to the fact that one-third of all American families now receive federal assistance from LIHEAP, the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Indeed, federal funding for LIHEAP is up more than 230 percent since 2008. With the new carbon rules in place, get ready for a future in which more than half of all Americans need federal assistance to pay their electricity bills.
Coal state Democrats like Senator Joe Manchin warned that the new rule "makes absolutely no sense and will have devastating impacts to the coal industry and our economy." But the words of a Senator serving the people of West Virginia don't count for much to people who see themselves as serving the Planet.
But to read the responses to the EPA's new rule through the lens of our fractured domestic politics doesn't tell the true story. It's through an international lens where the true costs of the new rule come into view.
Contrary to the impression conveyed in the climate change debate, U.S. and European carbon emissions are decreasing year-over-year. According to the EPA's own data, emissions per kilowatt-hour from coal-fueled electricity generation in the United States have been reduced nearly 90 percent since 1970.
That decline is more than offset by rising emissions in the rest of the world. China is on pace to build a new 500 MW coal plant every week -- for the next 30 years. And with a per-capita GDP that's 1/8h that of the U.S., China is not going to be sympathetic to suggestions that it limit its own energy growth in order to "atone" for a history of high emissions from the U.S. and Europe.
What's true for China is equally true elsewhere among the rising Pacific economies. The U.S. IEA projects that coal will supplant natural gas as the leading source for electricity generation in the 10 ASEAN nations, where energy demand is growing at more than double the global rate. Add in India, where carbon emissions are projected to rise by 60 percent from 2020 to 2040, and it's easy to see why a recent headline in the New Indian Express's editorial read: "Obama's Energy Policy to Benefit India and China."
There is absolutely no evidence that energy self-abnegation -- de-development as one of the President's advisors has called it -- on the part of the United States will spur other countries to slow their own industrialization. There's no leading by example here, if the impact on emerging economies is to stagnate at subsistence-level living.
So by all means let's look for ways to reduce carbon emissions. But we need a better plan than one that keeps tens of millions of Americans in energy poverty, puts the U.S. economy on a low- to no-growth track, and increases our energy-dependence exposure to nations that may use that leverage for political gain: All for a paper-thin reduction in projected global temperature by 2100.
For the next 120 days, the EPA's new rule is open for comment. Here's one: There has got to be a better way.
The goal, expressed in 645 pages of eye-glazing detail: to cut CO2 emissions from the U.S. power sector 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. The 30-by-30 mantra makes for a nice sound bite, but read through the EPA press releases for a projection on how that reduction will affect average global temperatures, and you'll come up empty. That's odd, for a policy that's justified as essential to save the planet.
So, how much will the new rule prevent Earth from warming? According to modeling done using the EPA's own MAGICC model -- Model for the Assessment of Greenhouse gas Induced Climate Change -- if the U.S. stopped emitting all carbon dioxide emissions today, the impact on projected global temperature rise would be a reduction of 0.17°C by the year 2100.
Using data drawn from U.S. Energy Information Administration, if the U.S. were to reduce all carbon dioxide emissions immediately to zero, the climatological savings would be cancelled out by the rest of the world's carbon dioxide production -- in just seven years.
And that's a 100 percent reduction, not the 30 percent called for under the new rule.
The war has already begun over the accuracy of the cost estimates for the new EPA rule advanced by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others, but the notion that the U.S. -- when 40 percent of the country's current electricity production comes from coal -- could weather the imposition of stringent carbon-emission standards without significant economic costs seems fantastic. Indeed, the more candid supporters of the new EPA rule celebrate just that fact: Coal will be priced into oblivion. In this view, rising energy prices will accelerate the transition to a post-petroleum energy future. The fact that ordinary Americans would be forced to cinch their own belts is a small cost to pay for planetary survival.
That leaves it to industry to speak for the average American. "Today, American policy should be guided not by a modeled crisis," said Peabody Energy, which produces 10 percent of U.S. electricity, "but by the real crisis of more than one of every three U.S. households that qualify for energy assistance," a reference to the fact that one-third of all American families now receive federal assistance from LIHEAP, the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Indeed, federal funding for LIHEAP is up more than 230 percent since 2008. With the new carbon rules in place, get ready for a future in which more than half of all Americans need federal assistance to pay their electricity bills.
Coal state Democrats like Senator Joe Manchin warned that the new rule "makes absolutely no sense and will have devastating impacts to the coal industry and our economy." But the words of a Senator serving the people of West Virginia don't count for much to people who see themselves as serving the Planet.
But to read the responses to the EPA's new rule through the lens of our fractured domestic politics doesn't tell the true story. It's through an international lens where the true costs of the new rule come into view.
Contrary to the impression conveyed in the climate change debate, U.S. and European carbon emissions are decreasing year-over-year. According to the EPA's own data, emissions per kilowatt-hour from coal-fueled electricity generation in the United States have been reduced nearly 90 percent since 1970.
That decline is more than offset by rising emissions in the rest of the world. China is on pace to build a new 500 MW coal plant every week -- for the next 30 years. And with a per-capita GDP that's 1/8h that of the U.S., China is not going to be sympathetic to suggestions that it limit its own energy growth in order to "atone" for a history of high emissions from the U.S. and Europe.
What's true for China is equally true elsewhere among the rising Pacific economies. The U.S. IEA projects that coal will supplant natural gas as the leading source for electricity generation in the 10 ASEAN nations, where energy demand is growing at more than double the global rate. Add in India, where carbon emissions are projected to rise by 60 percent from 2020 to 2040, and it's easy to see why a recent headline in the New Indian Express's editorial read: "Obama's Energy Policy to Benefit India and China."
There is absolutely no evidence that energy self-abnegation -- de-development as one of the President's advisors has called it -- on the part of the United States will spur other countries to slow their own industrialization. There's no leading by example here, if the impact on emerging economies is to stagnate at subsistence-level living.
So by all means let's look for ways to reduce carbon emissions. But we need a better plan than one that keeps tens of millions of Americans in energy poverty, puts the U.S. economy on a low- to no-growth track, and increases our energy-dependence exposure to nations that may use that leverage for political gain: All for a paper-thin reduction in projected global temperature by 2100.
For the next 120 days, the EPA's new rule is open for comment. Here's one: There has got to be a better way.
See Mr. President.
You Flying South Central Colors.
Thang Iz Barry O.
Gansta Wanna Be.
You For Sure Ain't Got Da Back To Da Yak.
Never Had It.
Never Will.
How's life all up in Bill 'Da Bitch' Ayers Zipper.
Cause Da Word On da Street.
You Nothin But A Gay Ass Crack Smokin Hood Rat WannaBe.
You as phoney as a 3 dollar bill.
Queer az hell.
Reggie Love.
Your lifetime 'Body Man' have your daily 8Ball secured yet Sir?
Squeaky Little Queer.
POTUS AWOL DURING BENGHAZIGATE SLAUGHTER ...adinakutnicki.com/.../potus-awol-during-benghazigate-slaughter
We now know where Obama was during Benghazi attack - Godlike ...
www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2544950/pg1
All that said Mr. President.
I am one of the Presidents Men.
A Marine.
Sworn To Honor.
Sworn To Protecting My President.
Yeah.
As such.
I would lay my life down for you.
And Pray and only hope that My God forgives me.
Sir.
You even sicken Allah.
A embarrassment to every Muslim that walks the earth.
You spread and condone hate across the globe.
Putin laughs at you. As well gives clear, concise Yak to The New York Times regarding what a sad ass bitch you really are.
But not to worry Sir.
50% of this once great country will vote for you and your kind again.
Hillary Da Pig Iz In The Wingz.
Ready to take over with her lying, murderous wayz.
Yep.
The Democratic Party.
Say.
Democrats.
Still Supporting The K.K.K.
Your Hateful Enforcement Arm.
KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party | National Black ...
www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm?...DYKKKKTerroristArm...Ku Klux Klan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_KlanKu Klux Klan - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com
www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klanHistory Of The Democrats And The KKK..... - Free Republic
www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309727/postsRise of the Ku Klux Klan . U.S. Grant: Warrior . WGBH ... - PBS
www.pbs.org/wgbh/.../features/.../grant-kkk/And hapless ignorant America screamin loud and proud for their Democratic Party Flag.
Clueless as ever.
Way out of touch would be a cyclopedia upgrade.
But here Ya All are. Standing Tall and Stupid. Ready to elect more Liers, Cheats and Murderers.
Hill.
and
Bill.
At this time The Author wants to sincerely apologize for yet Another Google/Blogger Dot Com Fuck Up In The Guise Of Italic Letters.
Google.
Ever Gonna Pay Me For The Ad Sense Dollars You Owe Me.
No.
Didn't Think So You Cheap Corporate Schiester Ass Holes.
Oh well.
Fuck Your Muthufuckin Fat Ass Hoe Mammas.
Faggots.
Oh.
That's Bad.
I Can't Say It.
Fuck you Too.
Have A Great Day.
Ryan. Out.
Check out Ryan Donovan @
ryanindaswamp.wordpress.com
The New
The Old
Da Real Cheeze
